Brands risk losing relevance in a networked world - if they continue to apply broadcast, one-size-fits-all thinking to it.
But, by listening, responding and adapting to its group-forming nature, brands can become more relevant than ever.
Chuffed to say the following slidedeck was selected to be featured on the
slideshare homepage on Aug 19.
What the network (the internet) is for:The internet is for forming groups.
The fact that people can use it to organise themselves around shared interests, passions and aims (
communities of purpose) at next-to-no-cost, disrupts everything.
People can organise themselves to achieve what
they want on a niched global scale.
This has world-changing implications for all forms of mediation - branding and brand messages included.
Three key disruptions:- Who gets to create content (control messages)? Any and everyone.
- Who gets to distribute content (share messages)? Any and everyone
- Who gets to control the user experience? The user is the destination now. They control their own A-where-ever journey.
You can't target every community of purpose. They can.
This 10-slide deck explains how allowing messages to evolve is the most efficient way of transmission in the networked world - and the only way of reaching into the increasingly long tail. It is the right response to life in a
complex adaptive system.
Without this reach your ability to achieve scale in the networked world relies wholly on one-size-fits-all quality. That's fine in broadcast mediums. But the network is not a broadcast medium. In networks, where communities of purpose form, relevance wins every time.
The timescale:The great disruption of the internet has only just begun.
It is only with the arrival of social networks that the majority of users have been offered an easy-to-use interface for accessing the power of the network; group forming (with purpose) on a global scale. When an interface becomes ubiquitous, then significant change occurs. Cite: The telephone.
It is only three years since myspace first clocked more page impressions than google. It is only three years since YouTube started changing the way we think about television.
The great disruption of the internet started just three years ago. You ain't seen nothing yet!
Key Lessons
1. Listen:Brands are what their users say they are.
Noah Brier's Brand Tags illustrates this in a so-funny-it-hurts (and not in a good) way.
Check out your brand now at brandtags.net. There is a
UK version too, but data is currently a little patchy.
Make it richer, here.Users
tweet about
coke,
british airways,
o2,
macdonalds, or anything else you care to name.
Search using your own terms at summize.com (twitter search)Their conversations tell you not only what they think about your brands, but also how, where and when they use them and who they are using them with. They use them as the content that sparks their conversations.
The conversations are happening with or without your consent, on or off your own mediated forums, branded social networks and chat rooms, in every connection between every node. Where people are, they talk. And where they talk, they talk about you.
Some brands are making great use of the new social mediums.
Zappos (an online shoe retailer in the US), for example. And David Armano at Logic + Emotion offers a useful reminder of
how brands should approach social media (using
twitter as his example).
You can't build communities or control the conversation. You can enable. Join them around their campfires. Be prepared to listen, then serve them with things that are useful - things they they will think are cool enough to pass on to others, who they think will think its cool, too. They are best placed to judge this. Not you.
You've got to be joking?Look on the funny side. Think how jokes are adapted to be passed on. How do you select which gag to tell which person or gathering. How do you adapt it to suit. That adaption = adoption by the next community of purpose.
The business caseSince approximately 70% of purchase decisions are made based on friend's recommendations (according to Forrester) - you have to seriously consider focusing more of your spend on connecting where the conversations are happening and placing higher value on the conversations and the results of those conversations.
Radian6 among other sentiment trackers, can reveal how your brands are being talked about. That's the information gathering phase... But there is a tangible connection between trust and responsiveness,
as Jeff Sonstein says.
2. RespondIn the networked world marketing isn't done to them, it's done by them. Think less about where the eyeballs are and more where the mouths and ears are. And think about joining their conversations in real time.
Real time captures the moment of inspiration. "I want to buy X". It is the essence of two of my more simple concepts, the
Intention Economy. and
Lean-To-Marketing.
Responses that work:Widgets with personal outcomes.Widgets that allow users to adapt them to better suit them to the community with whom they choose to share them next, are a brilliant fit with the networked world.
There are numerous examples. One of my favourites was Pampers US campaign last Christmas. It lowered technical barriers to allow any and everyone to mash up pictures of their own kids with a beautiful video and Silent Night message of Christmas peace. And that made it a widget with a personal outcome. Anyone who did it would want to share it with their close relatives, at least. And each of the receipients may like the idea sufficiently to adapt it to include their own children, and pass it on to the next adhoc community... and on it goes. Unfortunately it is no longer available
here.
Others include the
Simpsonizeme.com (can you
see what they'd done there?) which turns your mugshot into a Simpsons version of yourself, to coincide with the movie release. That does live on, in association with BurgerKing.
In each case we create a version for ourselves to take on our journey with us. And in the process it becomes our message to share with our communities.
Mark Earls (author of Herd) suggests "give them something to do together".
The
Cadbury's Gorilla's manifold reinterpretations on YouTube illustrate the power of this idea. And here's an important lesson, whether or not Cadbury wanted the network to take its idea and play with it and share it or not, that's exactly what happened. (hint, they aren't in control of the message. They never were).
You can tap into this.There are three conditions required for a successful widget.
1. A willingness to relinquish control.
2. Toolkits users can play with.
3. Creative users.
We've clearly got creative users. We can make their lives easier by lowering the technical barriers (as Pampers did) and providing tool-kits to make co-creation easier (just as
NiN have by providing tools on their website to allow fans to easily remix their work and share the results).
And since that which we create, we embrace, we're more likely to take on the role of marketer on behalf of what we have created, selecting the right communities of purpose to share the outcomes with.
2 & 3 are relatively easy. It's number 1 many struggle with. But without it you're left trying to control a message - trying to dictate where and when and how it will be delivered. And you're not very good at that - at least you're nowhere near as good as the people living in those communities.
This post
How We Are Made Great discusses how individually we cannot hope to be in control of turning the flock, how important it is to take a human social approach to changing opinion or behaviour.
In this world even the role of links is challenged (as I discussed in
Portability is the new Linkworthy)
They did a great job at
discovering people through content.
But we're entering a world in which
content is discovered through people.
Here
being pointed at is less important than
being taken with. Widgets are consumate
taken-with enablers.
Going on the journey all brands must make if they are to
adapt to survive in the networked world goes more than skin deep. It requires cultural shift, a cultural shift that makes the brand itself a better fit with the networked world. We are in transition - so
broadcast models still have great value - but the speed of the transition becomes faster by the day.
Great examples of brands listening to and adapting to the networked world:Zappos understand that customer service (
human interaction) is everyone's responsibility.
Pampers makes your kids the stars Christmas campaign.
NiN make mash-ups easy and shareable.
Where are the Joneses takes Ford to new places.
The Simpsons/Burger KingItsmy.com (their user-chooses-the-ad model leverages the social graph in a brilliantly simple way).
Spinvox for listening and responding. (and that reminds me of
qik's lean-too marketing)
Carphone Warehouse listens... (example of inevitable two-speed culture in a giant?)
Your further examples welcome. Post links in the comments below and I'll add them to the list as they come in.
I'm off for a little R&R. So I thought I'd leave you something chunky to download, read and digest while I'm gone.
